I think the Park is going to try to tell the Corps that the sidewalk at Big Spring is above the Ordinary High Water Mark. I doubt that BS is going to fly. And even if they can get that dog to hunt, they still have problems the whole "adjacent wetlands" concept. I am not enough of a whiz to know whether this is a section 10 or section 404 violation, but it is still stupid.
Here are some interesting tidbits. More later.
FAQ from the Corps site
Who should apply for a permit?
A. Any person, firm, or agency (including Federal, state, and local government agencies) planning to work in navigable waters of the United States, or discharge (dump, place, deposit) dredged or fill material in waters of the United States, including wetlands, must first obtain a permit from the Corps of Engineers. Permits, licenses, variances, or similar authorization may also be required by other Federal, state and local statutes.
What will happen if I do work without getting a permit from the Corps?
A. Performing unauthorized work in waters of the United States or failure to comply with the terms of a valid permit can have serious consequences. You would be in violation of federal law and could face stiff penalties, including fines and/or requirements to restore the area. Enforcement is an important part of the Corps regulatory program. Corps surveillance and monitoring activities are often aided by various agencies, groups, and individuals, who report suspected violations. When in doubt as to whether a planned activity needs a permit, contact the nearest district regulatory office. It could save a lot of unnecessary trouble later.
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899
33 U.S.C. 403
That the creation of any obstruction not affirmatively authorized by Congress, to the navigable capacity of any of the waters of the United States is hereby prohibited; and it shall not be lawful to build or commence the building of any wharf, pier, dolphin, boom, weir, breakwater, bulkhead, jetty, or other structures in any port, roadstead, haven, harbor, canal, navigable river, or other water of the United States, outside established harbor lines, or where no harbor lines have been established, except on plans recommended by the Chief of Engineers and authorized by the Secretary of War; and it shall not be lawful to excavate or fill, or in any manner to alter or modify the course, location, condition, or capacity of, any port, roadstead, haven, harbor, canal, lake, harbor of refuge, or enclosure within the limits of any breakwater, or of the channel of any navigable water of the United States, unless the work has been recommended by the Chief of Engineers and authorized by the Secretary of War prior to beginning the same.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Ms. Luann - First, and foremost, thank you for this blog. So many issues within ONSR have been whispered about in the past. It's nice to see them put into the light.
ReplyDeleteI wonder who is responsible for making sure the good folks in charge at ONSR are doing their job? Is it the regional office in Omaha?
-Current River Lover
Dear Anon,
ReplyDeleteOmaha is a long way from Van Buren. I am dedicated to making sure that the lines of communication get opened. Every Agency should have the opportunity to fix problems first, before other people have to become involved.
I can't say this loud enough or long enough. The folks in charge at ONSR are responsible for doing their job. The Super is in charge and is responsible. Period. The MWR office should be a communications depot not a supervisory depot. The Super has all the authority he needs to make the right things happen. Period. For the Love of Mike, he has the full weight of the United States Government behind him. Hand wringing not tolerated here.
Please spread the word. I believe in the effectiveness of bringing truth to power. Sometimes it is a little fun to find the right power source, but it can be done.
Luann
But for how long and at what cost do you give the Super time to do what's right?
ReplyDelete-CRL